W.Doctor EBM 搜尋與評估應用程式 — 提示詞版本

使用以下提示詞：將您的臨床情境或文章貼入輸入框，然後複製並貼到您偏好的 AI 工具中（如 ChatGPT）。

Page 1 — Question Formulation

Prompt (ready to copy): You are an evidence-based medicine expert. Based on the input, list two short, clear, clinically relevant questions in one or two sentences. Give me three key words for search on PubMed or Cochrane. Input: [paste clinical scenario or topic here] Your input (paste your clinical scenario, patient case, or topic):

Copy Prompt Copy Prompt + Your Input Clear

第一頁 — 問題確立

提示詞 (可直接複製): 你是實證醫學專家。請根據輸入內容，列出兩個簡短、清晰、臨床相關的問題（一兩句話）。請提供三個用於 PubMed 或 Cochrane 檢索的關鍵詞。 輸入內容: [在此貼上臨床情境或主題] 您的輸入 (貼上您的病患案例或主題):

複製提示詞 複製完整內容 清除

© W.Doctor 版權所有。本應用程式尊重您的隱私，所有輸入內容僅在瀏覽器本地處理，不會上傳至任何伺服器。

Page 2 — Literature Search

Prompt (ready to copy): You are an evidence-based medicine expert. IMPORTANT: The citation must be 100% accurate (Zero Hallucination). For the following clinical question, find five research papers in recent 5 years with the highest EBM level of evidence, limited to human studies and prioritizing the strongest evidence (ideally systematic reviews and meta-analyses; if not available, then search for randomized controlled trials, then observational studies). For each paper, provide a one-line citation, year, study type, a concise summary of main findings, and a brief note on quality/limitations. Clinical question: [paste your question here] Your input (paste the focused clinical question or PICO):

Copy Prompt Copy Prompt + Your Input Clear

第二頁 — 文獻搜尋

提示詞 (可直接複製): 你是實證醫學專家。重要：引文必須百分之百準確（零幻覺）。針對以下臨床問題，請在近五年內找到五篇具有最高循證醫學證據級別的研究論文，僅限人體研究，並優先考慮最強證據（最好是系統性文獻回顧和統合分析；若無，則搜尋隨機對照試驗，再者為觀察性研究）。針對每篇論文，請提供一行引文、年份、研究類型、主要發現的簡潔摘要以及品質/限制的簡短註釋。 臨床問題: [在此貼上您的問題] 您的輸入 (貼上您的專注臨床問題或 PICO):

複製提示詞 複製完整內容 清除

Page 3 — Critical Appraisal

Prompt (ready to copy): You are an evidence-based medicine expert. I will appraise the article provided below. Based on the article type (systematic review, RCT, cohort, case-control, diagnostic study, etc.), use the most appropriate critical appraisal tool (e.g., CEBM, CASP, GRADE, BMJ network-metaanalysis appraisal) to appraise it. Present the appraisal results clearly: (1) chosen appraisal tool, (2) domain-by-domain assessment with brief justifications, (3) overall risk of bias/quality rating, and (4) a short interpretation of how reliable/applicable the results are clinically. Article (title, authors, abstract or full text): [paste article text or abstract here] Your input (paste the article abstract or relevant excerpt):

Copy Prompt Copy Prompt + Your Input Clear

第三頁 — 批判性評估

提示詞 (可直接複製): 你是實證醫學專家。我將對以下提供的文章進行評估。請根據文章類型（系統性文獻回顧、隨機對照試驗、世代研究、病例對照研究、診斷研究等），使用最合適的批判性評估工具（例如：CEBM、CASP、GRADE、BMJ 網路統合分析評估）來進行評估。請清晰呈現評估結果：（1）選定的評估工具；（2）逐領域評估及其簡短理由；（3）整體偏差風險/品質評級；以及（4）簡短解釋結果在臨床上的可靠性和適用性。 文章（標題、作者、摘要或全文）：[在此貼上文章文本或摘要] 您的輸入 (貼上文章摘要或相關摘錄):

複製提示詞 複製完整內容 清除

Page 4 — Clinical Application

Prompt (ready to copy): You are a medical expert. Based on the results of the literature appraisal, apply them to the clinical scenario/patient. Please give me three most appropriate recommendations from evidence to decision and the analysis of cost effectiveness. Please use one or two sentences of colloquial language to explain to patients. Evidence summary or appraisal result: [paste summary here] Your input (paste the evidence summary or appraisal):

Copy Prompt Copy Prompt + Your Input Clear

第四頁 — 臨床應用

提示詞 (可直接複製): 你是醫學專家。請根據文獻評估的結果，將其應用於臨床情境/病患。請從證據到決策（EtoD）和成本效益分析的角度，給出三個最合適的建議。請使用一句或兩句口語化的語言向病患解釋。 證據摘要或評估結果: [在此貼上摘要] 您的輸入 (貼上證據摘要或評估結果):

複製提示詞 複製完整內容 清除